Yet another article about everyone’s favorite Progressive Christian/Religous Left commentator, Jim Wallis. I think, on some things, I agree with him but everything is couched so carefully and cautiously as to not offend that it’s quite difficult to determine what he believes.
He also expresses leeriness at applying “left” and “right” to “religious”
“Left” is a political term, and I don’t think religion fits neatly in the political category. The religious right is not critical enough of the political right and the Republican Party, and likewise people who are more progressive need to be very critical of—when need be—the left and the Democratic party. Religion shouldn’t be ideologically predictable, nor loyally partisan. It should have the capacity to critique both sides. I like the word “prophetic” best of all. “Progressive” is OK, but it still sounds kind of like a substitute for “liberal.”
I agree, progressive is intended as a substitute for liberal. But “prophetic”, you’re getting a little ahead of yourself Mr. Wallis. Be very, very careful about labeling anything prophetic, for prophets speak for God and I definitely wouldn’t want to set myself up as speaking for God. Hopefully, I allow Him to speak through me
Unfortunately, the article closes with an retreat back to the same old tired statements.
about a whole progressive faith movement that is growing and coming together and having more public face and public voice, and will join in serious debate, serious dialogue with the religious right.
Ok, you don’t like progressive. And you don’t like the term “religious left”, but it’s okay to refer to the religious right? Why don’t we just stop defining our faith in political terms and treat our brothers and sisters in Christ with the love that Christ commands from us.