‘Church Planting’ Category Archive

10 Reasons to Partner in Planting Now

Last week was my “week with Ed Stetzer”. He spoke powerfully at the Acts 29 Network Boot Camp in Louisville and then taught Missional Missiology at Re:Train. This was the best class yet. I loved the historical and present-day analysis and the opportunities for co-hort collaboration were significant.

Dr. Stetzer also wrote an article about churches partnering to plant churches. This is a fabulous idea, and even though it’s probably targeted at Southern Baptist Churches cooperating, I would love to see a church planting movement birthed in Ann Arbor that would bring together churches in multiple-denominations to plant and replant churches.

Here are 10 reasons to partner for church planting sooner rather than later.

1. The current economy is a perfect opportunity.

The current recession will force people to make hard decisions about where they place their values. It is not unprecedented to discover many anecdotal reports that say people are more open to church during such times. According to a recent Texas Tech study, economic growth and evangelical church growth are counter-cyclical. As the economy goes down, church attendance goes up. This reality can be traced back historically as well. America’s greatest church planting season, 1795-1810, occurred during a time of economic hardship. More recently, the planting boom led by the Vineyard and Calvary Chapel movements occurred during the economic malaise of the 1970s and early ’80s.

The consequential reason for this is simple: when our money and possessions disappear, we are forced to face our spiritual crises. Just as the prodigal son “came to his senses” after he’d squandered it all (Luke 15:17), the prodigals of our nation are primed to face their spiritual needs since they can no longer mask the need with their material wants.

The problem for the church is that our planting models are driven by economic realities that existed two years ago. But if we share resources and wisdom, we can more quickly and effectively respond to the needs of lost people

2. Plants do better when local people are sent out.

Research tells us there is a correlation between the significant involvement of a “mother church” and the success of a church plant. Consequently, more leaders are embracing the concept that churches plant churches

Local churches that recruit, train, and send out planters to their own communities   cultivate larger and healthier churches. The principle of churches planting churches has resulted in consistent success over centuries. The results are even surprising when multiple churches get together, sharing people and resources. Such indigenous cooperation makes for quicker and healthier starts.

3. Churches get healthier as and after they plant another church.

Although counterintuitive, sending out people for church planting support not only benefits the church planted but it benefits the church planting church. In a Leadership Network study, “The State of Church Planting in the United States,” (Overview, Full Report) we revealed:

Significantly, all surveyed churches have experienced growth in their own attendance as they faithfully continued to pursue outreach and mission  as the priority for their existence.

And according to the research conducted by Jeff Farmer in his Ph.D. dissertation, “Church Planting Sponsorship: A Statistical Analysis of Sponsoring A Church Plant as a Means of Revitalization of the Sponsor Church,” a “mother church” ends up in better condition six months after it plants a church than it was previous.

4. Shared DNA is better than solo DNA.

Let’s say a popular, resourceful megachurch gets excited about church planting and sends out a dynamic planter. The new planter will likely work at replicating the sending pastor’s gifting or the megachurch’s culture. A healthy church plant has its own DNA; it’s not a clone. If that planter partners with local people or additional local church communities, the new plant will pick up local DNA.

According to Stephen Gray’s research published in Planting Fast Growing Churches, 88.3% of church planters involved in fast-growing church plants weren’t flying solo but were part of a church planting team. Recruiting local leadership increases the connection a new church will have to its new community.

5. Planters who partner benefit from increased accountability.

The increased interest in church planting is a good thing. But this intense interest can create a zeal that, if left unchecked, can become a train wreck. Planters most often possess hard-charging personalities which benefit from the spiritual discipline involved with accountability. This type of relational environment provides both assessment and training to minimize burn out. Additionally, partnerships create an environment of encouragement and accountability. The result will be a planter ready for the marathon of church planting. Sharing the load and submitting to accountability leads not only to a healthier plant, it leads to a healthier planter.

6. Partnerships lessen the financial and resource burdens.

One of the most obvious needs of a new church is money and resources. Often these jugular issues are left to chance. When a planter partners with a church or a planting team, the financial burden and the workload is distributed more evenly. Working with multiple partners also increases the financial network to draw from in order to fund the church plant. It’s not good for the pocketbook or the physical health for man to plant alone.

7. People in the community need to reach their community.

In one common church model, we have people driving 30 minutes (or more) to worship every week. And that can be okay. But it is still a hindrance to those people reaching others in their communities. This is why we need more people attending local churches. Some churches have tried to solve this problem with the multi-site model, and some have experienced success. But nothing beats a local team exegeting its locale, living incarnationally in the locale, and leading the church to serve in the locale. If this isn’t happening, people invite their friends to church, but once the friends know they drive 30 minutes or more, they sometimes lose interest.

It’s hard to be missional if your worship and training always involves separation from your context. Proximity is key. So, planters should seek a community within which to start a church. The local community is the best location for creating partnerships and cultivating disciple making. It’s too difficult to pastor from afar.

8. You can take advantage of more effective exposure.

The math here is simple: if you spread out the responsibility, you spread out the news your church exists. We have found that people in other churches are often eager to help another church start strong. For instance, in one of our plants, we invited our partner church to go on a “$44 Mission Trip.” This basically involved helping us create 5,000 hand-addressed notes that we mailed to homes in our target community. Instead of hiring somebody to mass-produce a slick postcard for us, we enlisted help in creating actual notes in which one person from the partner church stuffed, addressed, and placed stamps on 100 envelopes.

These days slick postcards just blend in with the junk mail. If you’re like me, you always open hand-addressed mail first. So we got other churches involved in helping us. We discovered the more the project required hands-on participation, the more excited the volunteers got. When you partner with other churches, it takes less time to create buzz, cultivate enthusiasm, and build momentum.

9. It creates a vivid witness.

What the lost world often sees is churches setting up shop, like independent retailers. They see different brands: denominations, traditions, styles. They wonder why they should listen to anything we have to say when it sure looks like we won’t even listen to each other. But when churches partner, especially across “brands,” it creates a wonderful picture of Gospel reconciliation. And it communicates to the community that what unites us is greater than what divides us. Partnering with other churches is a brilliant witness to the unity Jesus prayed for in John 17

10. It is ultimately Kingdom-minded.

Partnering isn’t only a witness to the lost world; it is a testament to the universal reign of Jesus. By setting aside our own preferences and ambitions, we create a new story for people to consider. When we submit to each other and honor each other in loving cooperation, we do much more for the spread of the kingdom than when we cultivate our own private enterprises. Many times, church planting, even inadvertently, becomes about planting our own flag rather than flying the banner of the kingdom of heaven. When we work at having “all things in common” in church planting partnerships, we find ourselves more faithful to the presence of the kingdom.

When you survey the current realities in America, one would conclude these are not the best of times to consider church planting. Yet a survey of history would verify God does His greatest work during difficult times. People are looking for new realities beyond  money and personal assets. As churches hear from God, work together, and plant new churches in their local communities, we present a timely picture of God’s activity in the community. So, I think it is a great time for your church to partner with others to plant churches together.

Recap of Day 1 of the Acts 29 Boot Camp

Day 1 of the Acts 29 Boot Camp is over. It was a great day. Julie and I met people from all over the country and heard some powerful talks. Here’s a brief recap of what I heard. The notes aren’t going to be verbatim, mostly quotes

Session #1: “The Gospel & Ambition” – Dave Harvey

Passage: John 12-27-32, 32b-43. Some great quotes

  • “Loving the glory that comes from God means loving Jesus”
  • “Glory that comes from God demands a pursuit”
  • “The pursuit of God’s glory is the basis of Godly ambition”
  • “The search for approval is over because of the cross?
  • “Ambition is from, not for, a position of approval from God”
  • “Ambition should lead us to explore new opportunities to glorify God”
  • We should be unwilling to settle for a completed goal

Ambition is

  1. Perceiving the value of something – we’ll never ben ambitious for what we don’t value
  2. Prizing what we perceive
  3. Pursuing

Session #2: “The Evangelism of Church Planting” – Ed Stetzer

Wow. This was an amazing talk. This one is Julie’s favorite and could be mine. Incredibly challenging. He told us again and again and again that we need to evangelize.

Passage:  2 Timothy 4:1-5.

Evangelism in church planting is

  • Action: Do
  • Labor: The work of an evangelism
  • Focus: do your work evangelistically

Luther said “God doesn’t need your good works but your neighbor does”

  • “Do good works. Be, do, and tell Good News”
  • Invitationalism is a problem. People should not bring people to you to find Jesus

Session #3: “The Church & Ambition” – Steve Timmis

Passage: Romans 15

He spoke on Paul’s ambition for Christ, the church, and the lost as represented by his call to the local church, Spain, and Jerusalem

Session #4: “Leadership & Ambition” – Darrin Patrick

Darrin spoke this one directly to the men in attendance who are church planters or want to be. He really drilled us about the need to discern ourselves and raise up young leaders

Passage: 2 Timothy 2:1-6

  1. Paul discerned how he was gifted and helped others discern theirs. Paul was bold, evangelistic, and visionary (Acts 20:24). We should not think of ourselves more highly than we ought (Romans 12:3)
    We need to worship and serve to find out how we’re design
    Look at the three aspects of Jesus – Prophet, Priest, and King
  2. Live life with young leaders you’re trying to develop
    1. Talk regularly about your sins and fears (1 Timothy 1:15, 2 Timothy 4:9-13)
      1. Don’t use your pulpit as a confessional
    2. Praise them publicly
      1. 2 Corinthians 8:16-23
      2. direct and indirect praise
      3. You can’t over-compliment young leaders
    3. Put young leaders in challenging situations with oversight
      1. Delegation not abdication
    4. Get and give young leaders feedback
    5. Push them to repent of their sin and believe the Gospel specifically
      1. 1 Timothy 4:12, 2 Timothy 1:6-7, Titus 2:15 all deal with fear of man issues

“You can influence from afar, but you can only impact up close”

Church Planting from the Ground Up

Session #1: Gather & Develop – Kevin Jamison

Kevin is a church planter in Middletown, OH who will be one of Julie and my assessors’s on Thursday. This talk was incredibly practical and answered many of the questions that I’ve been think about with regards to gathering a core group.

II. Develop

Core development is pastoring

Develop Yourself:

  • Pastor your family
  • Watch your language
    • don’t dog your core
    • Use “we”
  • Watch your price
  • Set the pace with repentance
  • Give your wife permission to be painfully honest

Develop Your Core:

The importance of both Formal and Informal Gatherings

Formal

  • Teach & discuss
  • pray
  • sing
  • meets weekly
  • still be involved in local church

Informal

  • Hang out
  • Get to know

A Common Language = common theology

  • Clarify and define what words mean

A Common Mission

  • Help people take ownership of the mission
  • Ask others how we can reach their friends and familes

A Common Vision

  • Practical
  • “What would it look like it if the invisible kingdom were made visible in your city?”

I. Gather

  • Not an open door policy, be selective
  • Have people commit – sign a covenant

Who to Gather:

  • New Christians to the area
  • People that are F.A.T (Faithful, Available, adn Teachable)
  • People on a upward trajectory with their faith, regardless of age

Who to Avoid:

  • Wolves
  • Thieves
  • People who are skeptical
  • Taking people from churches that are growing and thriving

Where to Look:

  • Relational Networks
  • Partnering Churches

Final Advice

  • Wait for a public launch until you have 70-75
  • Go slow

Assessor and Assessee Dinner

Our day closed with a dinner with the other couples being assessed and the guys who are doing the assessment. Julie and I enjoyed getting to know Kevin, Nick, and Jerry. It was encouraging to hear their heart for us and to know that they’re praying for us. Their pastoral concern for Julie and my marriage and family is a wonderful expression of the love to be found between brothers and sisters in Christ.

Scott Thomas also shared with us the rating scale for the assessments. It’s

  1. Recommended
  2. Recommended with conditions
  3. Potential with strong conditions
  4. Not recommended

He shared some of the criteria that plays into a 4 (theology problems, financial problems, marital problems). The process is a little less daunting after tonight, but there is plenty of time left for me to get nervous. I have a gut feeling what our score will be, but I’ll save that for later …

Looking forward to the Acts 29 Boot Camp next week

The Acts 29 Network application process has taken some time and the actual boot camp itself and assessment have always seemed to be far off. Well, they are no longer in the distant future, they’re next week! We got an updated schedule yesterday and the names of our assessors. If I had to assemble a list of godly men that I would like to hear in person at a boot camp, I would have a hard time coming up with a better list than this

After the Boot Camp is over, Julie and I will be assessed by Acts 29 Pastors and their wives for 2 hours before I fly to Seattle for our next Re:Train class, Missional Missiology taught by Ed Stetzer. Our assessors are

I’m excited to meet them and for Julie and I to be examined by people who know what the life of a church planter is like. While I believe that God is specifically and clearly calling me and us to plant a church in Ann Arbor, MI, I welcome the input, direction, and guidance that comes through the assessment process and will take the outcome very seriously. Should our assessment uncover problematic areas that may make us ill-suited for church planting, we will prayerfully and earnestly seek God about the path to which He is calling us and endeavor to trust Him in all things.

Recent posts on multi-site

The practice of multi-site church is, in a nutshell, one church meeting in multiple locations with central leadership of the church. Some churches like Mars Hill in Seattle do multi-site across multiple states. Others, like Highview Baptist in Louisville, KY are committed to their particular city. This is a topic that warrants discussion because it goes to the very heart of what the church is called by God to be. I believe there is a particularlity to the use of church in the New Testament that defines the church as being a particular local, gathered assembly. Here’s the definition of church that I write for our Missional Ecclesiology class

A local gathered community of regenerated believers indwelt by the Holy Spirit, saved and reconciled through the substitutionary death of Jesus Christ, sent on mission all to the glory of God. The church is governed through congregational polity led by qualified male elders responsible for the right preaching of the Word. The church covenants together for holiness and discipleship; demonstrates and proclaims the true Gospel so as to evangelize the lost, bring back the wayward and serve the community; participates in the ordinances of believer’s baptism by immersion and the Lord’s Supper; and practices meaningful church membership and church discipline.

I’m still working on it, but it hits the main points

  • Location – Church is local and gathered
  • Composition-  Regenerated believers
  • Polity – congregational with male elders
  • Activities – discipleship, proclaim gospel, evangelism, ordinances of Lord’s Supper and Baptism, service

Southern Seminary presented a panel this week entitled “Perspectices on Multi-Site Churches” featuring R. Albert Mohler, Jr. (president of Southern), Gregg Allison (professor at Southern and in Re:Train), Kevin Ezell (Senior Pastor of Highview Baptist Church), Greg Gilbert (Senior Pastoral Assistant for Church Planting at Capital Hill Baptist Church), and Daniel Montgomery (Founding and Teaching Pastor at Sojourn Community Church) which featured both practitioners (everyone but Gilbert) and non-practitioners. It’s a great conversation and it is a testament to disagreeing in love.

Today, Thabiti Anyabwile of First Baptist Church Grand Cayman posted on the 9Marks blog about multi-site. I would say that I’m in agreement with 9Marks and their concerns about multi-site. Many of the proponents of multi-site champion its pragmatism and effectiveness. What if, though

the limits of single-site, single-serivce congregational life are limits divinely appointed to ensure careful pastoral oversight.  To ensure none of us actually have more sheep than we can handle by God’s grace.  Perhaps.

That’s a powerful reminder to me of the weight of the responsibility of shepherding the flock that God entrusts to me, even if that flock is only ever my wife and children.

Some Core Group Expectations

Building a core group is vitally important to planting a church. It’s also one of the areas that intimidates me. I love sharing my vision for a gospel-centered church in Ann Arbor with others, but the mechanics of turning that sharing into a somewhat cohesive group are fairly unknown. A post like this one from the Sojourn Community Church Church Planting Blog is very helpful to me, as it includes some examples of expectations for members of a core group.

As church planters bring together their core group it would be beneficial to write up a document that deals with correct and incorrect expectations members of the core group may have.  The church planter should lead the core group in reading and praying through the list of expectations in the document.  This process may help prevent unneeded or premature departures from the core group when personal expectations are not met.

Here is a sample list of expectations that could be included in such a document.  The expectations listed below have been adapted from a document developed at Fellowship Memphis in Memphis, TN.

As a member of the core group I need to understand that:

  1. Church Planting is exciting, but it will also bring times of pain, frustration, and disappointment.
  2. Even though gospel renewal may be taking place in the church, not everything will be as I think it should be.  The church will not be a perfect church.  Not every expectation will be met.
  3. At times the leadership may choose to focus on a particular ministry or take the church in a slightly different direction than I would take it.  In these times I should stand behind the leadership, believe the best about them, and trust that they are prayerfully leading the church as Christ leads them.
  4. Sacrifice is the norm, not the exception.
  5. Organizational and leadership structures will be fluid.  I may be in charge of one ministry one year and another the following year depending on the need.  Someone from the outside may be brought in to lead the ministry I was leading.  I should not have “pet projects” that I feel I have to lead myself.  Moreover, I may never have a leadership role in the church. Being in the core group does not guarantee me a position at the church. The church needs to place in leadership those who are best qualified not just those who have been around the longest.
  6. Many times my ideas will not be chosen. I should be OK with that. It is about God and his glory; it is not about me.
  7. I need to be careful not to expect that the church plant will look like the churches I have been a part of in the past. Each context is different and requires different types of churches.  What works in one location may not be the best approach in another location.
  8. I need to examine my motivation for joining the core group.  Is God calling me to the core group for this season of my life or am I just trying to escape a current situation? Am I following a personality or ministry philosophy?

As you can see many more expectations could be added to the list.  Some of the expectations may be general while others may be more specific to your situation.  Letting members of the core group know what to expect up front will inevitably lead to a healthier core group, which in turn will help the church be more effective in reaching its community with the gospel.

I guess all the news that’s fit to print includes me now

When the Ann Arbor News became AnnArbor.com, I was worried that any religion coverage would be gone since there doesn’t seem to be a big audience for it in town. Needless to say, I was encouraged to see some articles about faith appearing online, and in print in the Thursday paper.

Since there was still going to be some religion reporting in the paper, I decided to submit a story idea. Twp months ago, I wrote an email to a writer for AnnArbor.com suggesting a story about church planting in Ann Arbor. Here’s the email

I noticed that you’ve written the last two religion articles for AnnArbor.com and I wanted to suggest a story for you. Church planting, starting  new churches, has been a growing trend in evangelical Christianity  over the past few years and there are a number of church plants in  Ann Arbor and Ypsi now or coming soon. 

  • University Reformed Church replanted as Grace Ann Arbor, official re-launch Sept 13
  • Mosaic Church, a plant of Oak Pointe church in Novi, official launch Sept 13
  • The Greenroom, a church focused on reaching the arts community in Ann Arbor, is being planted by The River Community Church in Hartland
  • Connections Community Church was planted last April in Ypsi

The sudden increase is in stark contrast to the previous 20 years which has seen very few (maybe 3) churches planted in Ann Arbor in that are not mainly student focused. For full disclosure, I’m part of Grace Ann Arbor, serving as the Church Planting resident and  looking to plant a church in Ann Arbor most likely in 2011.

I didn’t see any articles in the paper relating to this topic, so I figured the editors decided that this wasn’t a good story.

I was pretty surprised, then, that on Monday, October 6, Janet Miller of the AnnArbor.com called to interview me for an article related to the story idea that I submitted. We talked for about 30 minutes, about church planting, its presence in the Bible, its necessity, etc. She asked me if only evangelical churches plan (no), how it works, if when I plant I plan to target specific demographics or niches (no), thinks like that. I thought it went pretty well, although I realized after the fact that I need a clearer, more concise definition of gospel-centered church for the next time I’m in that situation.

When today came, I went outside to get the paper (Brrrr) and found the article, which online is entitled New churches planted to reach special niches, new members but in print the headline has something to do with technology (not entirely sure why there are such different headlines). All in all, the article seemed pretty fair. I would have loved to have heard from Shannon Nielsen at Mosaic Church or Dexter Hardy at Connections Community Church to get the perspective of churches that were starting more from scratch, but I realize that every article can’t cover everything. I’m praying that God will be glorified through this article, that people will be transformed through the regeneration available through the Holy Spirit’s work in us and that Christ and His cross will be proclaimed by these, and all, churches in Ann Arbor.

23 Factors in Finding a Facility

Finding a facility is one of the most daunting aspects of planting a church. I’ve thought a little about possible locations in Ann Arbor, but I haven’t put the effort into the search that I know it needs. The Acts 29 Network blog has recently posted a three part series (part one, part two, part three) written by Mark Driscoll listing twenty-three factors to consider when looking for a facility for a church. Now the search looks even more difficult!

  1. Sight – Does the building look nice and well-maintained?
  2. Time Flexibility – Is there freedom to change service times, come in early to setup, add a second service?
  3. Set-Up and Tear Down – How much effort is required? Is there storage?
  4. Smell - Gyms smell like sweat, cafeterias smell like food. Keep in mind the original use of your facility
  5. Comfort – Is there AC/heat? Is there ventilation? Is there proper seating?
  6. Lighting – Is the room too light for projection or too dark for seeing?
  7. Acoustics – How well does the room reflect/absorb sound?
  8. Power – Does the facility have sufficient, clean power?
  9. Location – Where is the facility located? Is it near major roads/freeways? Is it in the location to which you’re called?
  10. Children’s Space – Is there sufficient space for children’s ministry? Can that area be safe, secure, and clean?
  11. Room for Fellowship – Is there sufficient space for people to hang out and mingle before and after service?
  12. Cost – How much does the facility cost?
  13. Storage – Can things like sound equipment and children’s ministry supplies be stored on-site?
  14. Public Perception – Will the location affect people’s view of the church?
  15. Parking – Is there sufficient parking (one space for every two or three church attendees)?
  16. Additional Space – Is there a kitchen/gym/dining area? Are there additional classroom spaces or office space?
  17. Additional Use – Can the facility be used for special events or services or for midweek activities?
  18. Cleanliness – Is the location clean? Cleanliness says a lot
  19. Accessibility – Is the location easy to find? Near major roads or highways?
  20. Signage – Can temporary or permanent signs be used to indicate events and services?
  21. Conflicting Dates – Can you be “bumped” from the facility? Does your rental take precedence over others?
  22. Contact Length – “It is to your benefit to negotiate for a long-term contract that provides you a short escape clause should you decide to move to another location”
  23. Facility Options for Consideration – “schools, churches, hotels, warehouses, community centers, theaters, and concert venues.”

Update on Acts 29 application process

I started the Acts 29 Network application process back in March. The process includes completing a number of documents like a testimony & call narrative, an overview of my marriage & family life, my theological and pastoral positions, a planting strategy and timeline, and an essay written by Julie about my call, her rote in that, her thoughts, etc. Addtionally I took entrepreneurial and DISC assessments and got references from a supervisor (Joel VanderSchel, pastor at New Life Church), a friend (Chris Rhodenhizer, pastor at Image Church), and a disciple (someone who was part of the small group that I led in Virginia). It was a very thorough application process that I completed last Friday.

After completing all the materials, the next to-do is a phone interview with Tyler Powell, the Church Planting Strategist with the Acts 29 Network. I had my phone interview last night and it went pretty well, I think. I was pretty nervous before it mostly because of the unknown of what exactly he would ask, how I would respond, etc. Some things came up that are concerns as I go forward with the Acts 29 application process

  1. Very low entrepreneurial skills as measured by the evaluation
  2. A DISC “score” that would be inconsistent with the typical profile of a successful church planter. #1 and #2 combined “might” indicate that I’m more of a #2 than lead planter. This is one area that the Acts 29 Assessment should give me some clarity on.
  3. The church polity (government) that I intend to follow differs from many in Acts 29 and I need to provide additional clarity about what I mean when I say “elder-led congregationalism”. For a good summary of a summary of what I intend, read P.J. Tibayan’s blog post
  4. My timeline (18-24 months) is further out than is typical (12-18 months) for men going through assessment. I based my timeline on a couple of factors
    1. Re:Train goes through June and I will very busy with that.
    2. Being in a college town makes launching in the fall natural and fall 2010 seems unlikely
    3. Launching at the beginning of second semester may work in the south, but January in Michigan would be dicey

So, there are definitely some potential red flags, but none of them were a great surprise to me. What I have consistently said is that I desire the input of men who have gone through the church planting process who can let me know if they see this as what God is calling me to and equipping me for. To that end, Julie and I will be assessed at the November Acts 29 Boot Camp in Louisville and from there we hope and pray to have additional clarity about the call to plant churches in Ann Arbor and beyond.

I have also prayed for patience, wisdom, and insight from God as I go through all of this, that I would welcome correction and direction humbly and that I would not seek glory for myself through church planting, but that my chief aim would be to magnify the name of the Lord. If I can do that, worship the Lord and lift Him up, then I will be content however He uses me.

Missional churches doing global missions

Ed Stetzer writes from Taiwan about why missional churches don’t do global missions but seem more interested in local work

  1. In rediscovering God’s mission, many have only discovered its personal dimensions.
  2. In responding to God’s mission, many have wanted to be more mission-shaped and have therefore made everything “mission.”
  3. In relating God’s mission, the message increasingly includes the hurting but less frequently includes the global lost.
  4. In refocusing on God’s mission, many are focusing on being good news rather than telling good news.
  5. In reiterating God’s mission, many lose the context of the church’s global mission and needed global presence.

Ed then offered four principles to consider when putting the “missions” in “missional”

  1. Recognize it is God’s mission, and we need to be passionate about the mission as He describes it. We don’t own mission and it is not ours to define. A church vision statement is fine, but God’s mission is better and bigger. Our first task is to submit to God’s mission.
  2. Evangelicals have understated the call to serve the poor and the hurting and need a stronger engagement in social justice. This sounds counterintuitive if we are seeking to remedy the loss of concern for articulated evangelism. But social engagement entails relational engagement, and relational engagement entails opportunities to share the gospel. The successes and experiences in our communities should awaken hearts and minds to global needs. We just need to maintain the reason for social justice: the glory of God in the worship of Jesus.
  3. Share God’s deep concern about His mission to the nations– that His name be praised from the lips of men and women from every corner of the globe. Feel the Great Commission in your bones. Ask God to turn your heart to those you cannot see. As Paul did, develop ways to “struggle personally” (Colossians 2:1) for those far away.
  4. Churches that are serious about joining God on his mission will obey his commands to disciple the nations. The end product of missional endeavors should be a thriving Christian ready to produce more thriving Christians.

He closed with a great exhortation to never separate the Great Commandment from the Great Commission

It appears to me that many missional churches are missing the Great Commission in the name of being missional. That makes zero sense. It is a huge (but historically common) mistake.

If we are truly interested in being missional– in joining God on His mission– our efforts should actually reflect His stated mission. We are bound to the Great Commandment as the fullest human expression of God’s love. But the Commandment is not hermetically sealed off from the Great Commission. Rather, the Great Commission provides the what of mission, while the Great Commandment provides part of the how. Answering the age-old question of “Who is my neighbor?” should result in the desire to “make disciples of all nations.”

Replanting a church

In anticipation of being assessed as a church planter, I wonder how I will respond if my “grade” on the assessment indicates that church planting isn’t the most appropriate ministry for how God has made me. Maybe I’m better suited to pastor or replant an existing church. I don’t know, but I’m definitely praying about it.  This post from Scott Thomas on the Acts 29 Network Blog provides helpful thoughts when Envisioning a Replant.

  1. Envision what the worship gathering could be (Acts 2:42-47).
    • Attitude of body during worship
    • Music
    • Prayer
    • Teaching
    • Communion
    • Children
    • Exaltation of God
    • Incorporation of arts
  2. Envision what the evangelism could be (Matt. 28:18-20; Acts 1:8).
    • Who can you reach immediately?
    • What attitudes toward evangelism need to change?
    • Where or how could you boldly make an impact with the gospel?
    • What steps of faith need to be taken to reach the unchurched and the unsaved?
    • How could your youth evangelize?
    • How could households evangelize together?
    • What worldwide impact could you make as a body (i.e. foreign missions)?
    • How are you going to be an eternal value to your community?
  3. Envision how education and discipleship could be effective (Acts 2:42).
    • How will it become a passionate pursuit of the body (“continue steadfastly in the Apostles’ doctrine,” Acts 2:42)?
    • What resources (people, qualities, gifts) do you have in place to launch greater disciple-making?
    • How will the fathers and heads of households (single moms, etc.) be trained to be the priest and spiritual head of their homes?
    • How will the older men and women teach and interact with the younger men and women? (Titus 2)
    • Will the age groups be segregated (children, youth, singles, college, married, etc.) or will they be integrated into the body?
    • What role will small groups play?
    • What training will be needed to help develop disciples who are passionately pursuing Christ?
  4. Envision an Acts 2 commitment to fellowship (Acts 2:44-45).
    • In what ways will the body seek to meet the needs of one another (spiritual, social, financial, physical)?
    • What attitudes need to change to be sacrificially generous with time, money and resources for the encouragement and edification of the body?
    • How will the body serve one another actively and responsively in an unprompted way?
    • What will the membership requirements be? How will it communicate a covenantal commitment?
  5. Envision an effective youth and children’s ministry.
    • Will they be integrated into the church ministry? If so, how?
    • How will families be strengthened through the student ministry?
    • How will the youth be encouraged and trained to evangelize their friends?
    • What role will the heads of households play in the student ministry?
    • Who (person or groups) will lead the youth and children’s ministry?
    • What facility changes are needed to communicate the value of children and youth?
    • What other positions of leadership need to be filled to be effective?
    • What leadership development with the students will be put into place?
    • What programs or customs need to be extracted from the youth and children’s ministry to avoid distractions from the ministry goals?
  6. Envision an equipping staff (Eph. 4:11-13).
    • What changes need to be made with the staff (paid or volunteer) to meet the church’s goals?
    • Are the staff members doing the ministry or leading people to do the ministry? If they are doing the bulk of the ministering, how will they develop the body to do the work of the ministry?
    • Are you over-staffed or under-staffed to meet both financial obligations and the development of lay people (taking responsibility for ministry)?
  7. Envision a body not reacting to finances to determine God’s call (Matt. 6:24).
    • How will faith in God calling a body to reach out to the community and world be weighed against financial responsibility and stewardship?
    • If mortgages or debts exist, how will they be paid off in a realistic way over a reasonable time period?
    • What attitudes or practices about money and finances need to be changed?
    • Is a budget in place? Is it a true reflection of the church’s giving and spending (balanced budget)?
    • What expenses can be cut immediately to be redirected toward the church’s mission?
    • Is the body (especially the leadership) making decisions based on finances or on God’s calling?
    • What creative ways can you generate more income without sacrificing resources, biblical principles, or expending paid personnel?